ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2026
Incidence and pathophysiology of gastrointestinal bleeding during mechanical circulatory support: A retrospective analysis using machine learning algorithms.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnd-organ hypoperfusion from cardiopulmonary shock may require mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, patients receiving MCS risk the development of hemorrhagic complications, including gastrointestinal bleeding (GI). Examining potential risk factors for these complications improves clinical understanding. The purpose of this investigation was to study the risk for GI bleeding in MCS patients.
methodsFollowing IRB approval, patient characteristics, previously reported comorbidities, and the incidence of GI bleeding were reviewed from January 2017 to October 2023. Clinical variables underwent machine learning with autovalidation. Support vector machine modeling provided the best performance among the ensemble models tested.
resultsIn this study of 156 patients who underwent 284 MCS procedures, the incidence of GI bleeding was 6.0% CI 3.3-10.4%. Following machine learning, patients with insulin-dependent diabetes were associated with GI bleeding. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 with a misclassification rate of 7.5%. The relative risk of the need for major transfusion (>2 packed red blood cell units/episode) was 1.7 CI 1.1-2.5. The majority (87%), but not all, of these patients received unfractionated heparin therapy. Finally, hospital length of stay was increased in patients with GI bleeding.
conclusionInsulin-dependent diabetes was associated with increased risk for GI bleeding during MCS, and these patients more often required major transfusions. Further evaluation of continuous anticoagulation therapy is warranted. Knowledge derived from this analytical study may guide the development of institutional protocols to improve care in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.