ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Distinct clinical and microbial profiles in left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer: a comprehensive analysis.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota regulation and Traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome differentiation in right- and left-sided colon cancer heterogeneity - A review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the clinical and microbial differences between left-sided colorectal cancer (LCC) and right-sided colorectal cancer (RCC), as well as the microbial profiles in tumor tissues (T) and peritumoral tissues (P) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. A total of 240 tissue samples were collected from CRC patients and classified based on the tumor location (LCC vs RCC) and tissue type (tumor vs peritumoral). Clinical data were recorded, and microbial analysis was performed using 16S rRNA sequencing. Bioinformatics analysis assessed microbial diversity and community composition, with statistical tests identifying significant differences between groups. LCC patients were older, heavier, and taller, with higher levels of tumor markers (CEA and CA199). Microbial analysis showed no significant differences in species evenness or richness between LCC and RCC; overall beta-diversity patterns did not differ significantly, although several taxa and predicted functions exhibited differential abundance between the two groups. Functional analysis revealed significant differences in KEGG Orthologs (KOs) and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) between LCC and RCC. Tumor tissue exhibited lower microbial diversity compared to peritumoral tissue, with significant differences in the microbial community structure. Our findings highlight the importance of considering sidedness and microbial composition in CRC management. The distinct microbial profiles in tumor and peritumoral tissues provide potential biomarkers for early detection and treatment response prediction. Future research should further explore these differences and their clinical implications.IMPORTANCEColorectal cancer (CRC) exhibits marked biological and prognostic differences between left-sided (LCC) and right-sided (RCC) tumors, yet the role of the tumor-associated microbiome stratified by sidedness remains poorly defined. In this study of 240 Chinese patients, we report the first integrated analysis combining clinical features with tissue microbial profiles (tumor vs peritumoral) according to the primary tumor location. We report differential abundance of specific taxa and predicted metabolic functions between LCC and RCC, plus significantly reduced diversity and altered structure in tumor tissue (T) compared with the adjacent normal tissue. These findings underscore the necessity of considering tumor sidedness and intratumoral microbiota in CRC classification, risk assessment, and precision therapy and highlight candidate microbial signatures as potential noninvasive biomarkers for early detection, sidedness prediction, and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.