Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41823369›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of surgery2026

Surgery for interplanetary space missions.

Raghav Khanna, Yang Li, Matthew Cook, Preeti Sawant, Raymond Hounon, Danielle Carroll, Lakita Lowe, Lukas Lindenroth, Toktam Mahmoodi, Nicholas Raison and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Raghav KhannaGuy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Yang LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Matthew CookUK Space Agency, Didcot, UK.
Preeti SawantNational Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Raymond HounonAlibaba Cloud Intelligence Group, Hangzhou, China.
Danielle CarrollUC Space Health, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Lakita LoweNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lukas LindenrothSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Toktam MahmoodiCentre for Telecommunications Research, King's College London, London, UK.
Nicholas RaisonDepartment of Urology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alejandro GranadosSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Anu OjhaUK Space Agency, Didcot, UK.
Christos BergelesSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain.
Sebastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Prokar DasguptaDepartment of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As human spaceflight expands beyond low Earth orbit, the ability to deliver advanced surgical care in space becomes critical. Current medical provisions on board the International Space Station (ISS) are geared towards treating low-risk conditions, with a 'stabilize-and-evacuate' principle for more complex cases-an approach that is not viable for extended missions to the Moon and Mars. This review summarizes research conducted around space surgery, with a particular focus on surgical robotics. Experiments in parabolic flight and analogue environments demonstrate that, provided the operator, patient, and instruments are restrained, surgical skill is largely unaffected by reduced gravity. Robotic surgery has primarily been explored in remote undersea habitats and in limited flight studies. There are several challenges to the implementation of surgical systems in space, including size, weight, and power constraints, communication latency, and crew training. Means of fluid and debris containment, provision of anaesthesia, and postoperative recovery in altered physiology must also be considered. The key features of an ideal space surgery robotic set-up are outlined. It should be compact, multifunctional, adaptable, reliable, and optimized in technical design and material composition for use in habitable volumes. Such systems should incorporate artificial intelligence (AI)-driven decision-making support, variable autonomy, and human-in-the-loop control. Crew members must be trained and supported to deliver and recover from surgical care in space. Cloud and edge computing will mitigate latency while expanding on-board data processing capabilities. Although not yet operationally mature, robotic surgery is a critical capability for future exploratory space missions, but requires continued multidisciplinary development.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresSpace FlightHumans

Identifiers

PMID41823369
PMCPMC13016761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.