Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41823308›Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology ecology2026

Beyond Koch's postulates: the pathobiome paradigm in grapevine esca disease.

David Gramaje, Ales Eichmeier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David GramajeInstituto de Ciencias de la Vid y del Vino (ICVV), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de La Rioja - Gobierno de La Rioja, Ctra. LO-20 Salida 13, Finca La Grajera 26071 Logroño, Spain.
Ales EichmeierMendeleum - Institute of Genetics, Mendel University in Brno, Valticka 334, 691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic.

Funding

European Regional Development FundMinistry of Science, Innovation and Universities PID2023-147360OR-C32
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esca is one of the most damaging fungal diseases of grapevine and continues to defy Koch's postulates. Although Phaeomoniella chlamydospora, Phaeoacremonium minimum, and Fomitiporia mediterranea are consistently associated with wood necrosis in esca-symptomatic vines, they also occur in asymptomatic vines and even in apparently healthy wood tissues without visible necrosis, and single-species but also mixed-species inoculations rarely reproduce the characteristic foliar symptoms. We hypothesize that esca is best understood as a stress-mediated pathobiome disorder of the grapevine holobiont rather than a predictable outcome of specific fungal combinations, shifting focus from pathogen identity to holobiont functional state and environmental context. In this Review, we integrate evidence from community ecology, vascular biology, and multi-omics studies to link microbial community structure and activity with host hydraulics, defence, and environmental drivers. Metabarcoding and metatranscriptomics indicate that symptom expression correlates with functional reprogramming of trunk-inhabiting fungi more than their mere presence, while metabolomics and epigenomics reveal localized physiological disruption combined with systemic regulatory responses. Climatic and edaphic stresses, particularly drought, are strongly associated with holobiont destabilization and dysbiosis, altering symptom expression without necessarily modifying pathogen occurrence. We propose a temporal, multi-phase model integrating colonization history, microbiome restructuring, and host stress physiology through long-term feedbacks. This framework emerges through convergent multi-omics evidence and generates testable predictions for early detection, microbiome-informed biocontrol, and resilience-oriented vineyard management strategies.

Indexed as

AscomycotaPlant DiseasesVitisHost-Pathogen InteractionsMultiomicsStress, Physiologicalabiotic stressdysbiosisescaholobiontmulti-omicspathobiome

Identifiers

PMID41823308
PMCPMC13032870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.