Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Factors Associated With Telemedicine Use by Cardiologists for Medicare Beneficiaries in 2022 to 2023: An Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services created a waiver to reimburse telemedicine services. It is important to understand factors that facilitate incorporation of telemedicine into ongoing cardiovascular practice.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of telemedicine and office visits delivered by cardiologists between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023, for Medicare beneficiaries. We calculated the adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) of telemedicine visits, representing the proportion of a physician's visits delivered by telemedicine, to identify factors associated with telemedicine use.
resultsThere were 23 334 physicians in our cohort; they were predominantly men (84.8%) and affiliated with a hospital (93.5%), and the majority were general cardiologists (66.1%). During 2022 and 2023, 3.4% of visits were delivered by telemedicine. In a regression model adjusted for beneficiary and provider characteristics, several physician-level factors were associated with increased telemedicine: female sex (aIRR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.41-1.57]), electrophysiology specialty (aIRR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.47-1.67] compared with general cardiology), and caring for a high proportion of beneficiaries living in areas of social vulnerability (quartile 3 aIRR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.12-1.32]; quartile 4 aIRR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.16-1.39]). Caring for more beneficiaries residing in a rural area (aIRR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.66-0.76]) or the South (aIRR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.55-0.66]) and for beneficiaries aged >85 years (aIRR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.81] were associated with lower use of telemedicine).
conclusionsTelemedicine is used relatively sparsely among cardiologists. Physician factors, including sex; specialty; and the vulnerability, rurality, and age of beneficiary panels, impact the degree to which telemedicine is a major part of clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.