Observational studyClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Avatrombopag and Platelet Recovery in Sepsis-Associated Thrombocytopenia: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and Safety of Avatrombopag in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease and Thrombocytopenia Undergoing Elective Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundSepsis-associated thrombocytopenia (SAT) is a common complication in critically ill patients and is associated with increased disease severity and adverse outcomes. Platelet transfusion is the main supportive therapy but provides limited and transient benefit. Evidence regarding thrombopoietin-receptor agonists in SAT remains scarce.ObjectivesTo evaluate the association between avatrombopag administration and platelet recovery, clinical outcomes, and safety in critically ill patients with SAT.MethodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective observational cohort study of adult ICU patients with SAT between May 2022 and May 2024. Patients were categorized according to avatrombopag exposure during the ICU stay. The primary outcome was platelet recovery at day 14. Secondary outcomes included platelet recovery at days 7 and 10, 28-day mortality, and ICU length of stay. Confounding was addressed using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Associations were assessed using weighted regression models, with prespecified sensitivity and subgroup analyses.ResultsAmong 256 included patients, 119 received avatrombopag and 137 did not. After IPTW adjustment, avatrombopag use was independently associated with higher odds of platelet recovery at day 14 (odds ratio 3.58, 95% confidence interval 1.31-9.79). No consistent benefit was observed for early platelet recovery at day 7 or day 10. Avatrombopag use was not associated with reduced 28-day mortality. Rates of bleeding and thrombotic events were similar between groups. However, avatrombopag exposure was consistently associated with a longer ICU length of stay. Subgroup analyses suggested greater platelet recovery benefit in patients with higher platelet transfusion requirements and greater illness severity.ConclusionsIn critically ill patients with SAT, avatrombopag administration was associated with improved delayed platelet recovery without increased bleeding or thrombotic risk. This hematologic benefit did not translate into improved short-term survival and was accompanied by prolonged ICU stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.