Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41823074›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2026

Spatial Distance and Temporal Attentional Focus Modulate Voluntary Action Preparation and Awareness.

Gaiqing Kong, Bastien Barlerin, Clément Desoche, Luke Miller, Francesco Pavani, Alessandro Farnè, Marine Vernet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gaiqing KongImpact Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL) INSERM U1028 CNRS UMR5292 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-3730
Bastien BarlerinImpact Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL) INSERM U1028 CNRS UMR5292 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Clément DesocheImpact Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL) INSERM U1028 CNRS UMR5292 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Luke MillerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Francesco PavaniCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences-CIMeC, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Alessandro FarnèImpact Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL) INSERM U1028 CNRS UMR5292 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-3491
Marine VernetImpact Team of the Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre (CRNL) INSERM U1028 CNRS UMR5292 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-3567

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE28-0001Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-23-CE28-0009Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-24-CE28-1809Fondation Fyssen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripersonal space (PPS)-the immediate space surrounding the body-modulates perception and motor control. However, its impact on how voluntary actions are initiated and subjectively experienced remains underexplored. Similarly, how directing attention to different phases of an action, such as intention formation versus execution, and anticipating outcomes of an action, modulates the neural readiness for movement, has yet to be fully examined. This study investigates whether spatial proximity, attentional focus, and anticipated action outcomes influence action preparation and action awareness, using a virtual reality adaptation of the Libet clock paradigm during EEG recordings. Neural results reveal that attentional focus and anticipated action outcomes modulate different phases of motor preparation, as indexed by the readiness potential (RP)-a gradual buildup of neural activity preceding voluntary movement. Focusing on decision timing (without subsequent action outcomes) enhances early RP amplitude and decreases the late RP slope, suggesting increased preparatory neural engagement during intention formation. In contrast, focusing on action execution leads to a steeper late RP slope, indicating later and faster motor activity buildup when attention is directed toward movement onset. Anticipating action outcomes increased late RP slope, which was accompanied by the temporal binding effect: when a tone followed the action, both decision and action estimates shifted toward it. Spatial proximity also modulates early RP slope, with a steeper buildup in near versus far space, suggesting facilitated motor preparation within PPS. It further enhances the late RP amplitude when participants focused on their intention to act. Behavioral results show that actions are perceived as occurring earlier when the clock is displayed near compared to far, indicating that PPS influences the temporal perception of action timing. Overall, these findings highlight the dynamic interplay among external spatial context and internal cognitive processes in shaping motor preparation and action awareness. Importantly, a temporal internal attentional focus on intention to act modulates early RP-traditionally considered an unconscious stage of neural readiness. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of how PPS and the locus of attention on specific action phases affect action preparation and awareness, with potential implications for future research on the sense of agency and voluntary action decision making.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalAttentionAwarenessContingent Negative VariationIntentionMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultaction awarenessaction outcomeattentional focusmotor preparationreadiness potentialspatial proximitytemporal bindingvoluntary action

Identifiers

PMID41823074
PMCPMC12983192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.