Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822991›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2026

Deep roots through time and crops: insight from five seasons at DeepRootLab.

Eusun Han, Corentin Clément, Weronika Czaban, Abraham George Smith, Dorte Bodin Dresbøll, Kristian Thorup-Kristensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eusun HanDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6338-2454
Corentin ClémentDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7942-3756
Weronika CzabanDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4717-7981
Abraham George SmithDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-2825
Dorte Bodin DresbøllDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6374-7257
Kristian Thorup-KristensenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Højbakkegård Allé 13, DK-2630, Taastrup, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5476-985X

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 884364Villum Fonden VKR023338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-rooted crops accessing water and nutrients from deep soil layers enhance the resource base for crop production. However, studying these roots in field conditions is labour-intensive, limiting research scope. We established a field root research facility with 48 plots for replicated experiments. The facility includes 144 6-metre-long minirhizotron tubes and an AI-based pipeline for rapid root trait analysis. We also attempted to install access tubes and customized ingrowth core production for less-invasive root activity determination. Our study revealed significant differences in deep root density among species, particularly at depths of 2.5 to 4.5 m, over 5 years. The less-invasive studies using ingrowth cores reached depths of 4.2 m. Nutrient tracer

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPlant RootsSeasonsSoilTime FactorsWaterSoilWaterdeep learningdeep rootshigh throughputperennial cropsroot facilityroot phenotyping

Identifiers

PMID41822991
PMCPMC13103413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.