ArticleInternational endodontic journal2026
A Comparison of Endodontic Microbiomes Associated With Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis by Next-Generation Sequencing.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis cross-sectional study aimed to compare the endodontic microbiome assessed from root canals of teeth associated with either symptomatic or asymptomatic apical periodontitis and analysed by 16S rDNA gene sequencing. METHODOLOGY: 60 teeth presenting clinical and radiographic signs of symptomatic or asymptomatic apical periodontitis (n = 30) were included in this cross-sectional study after participants had given their written informed consent. After isolation with rubber dam, disinfection and access cavity preparation, glide paths were prepared using C-Pilot Files and K-Files under electronic root canal length control. Microbial samples were collected from a total of 120 root canals (symptomatic apical periodontitis, SAP: n = 62, asymptomatic apical periodontitis, AAP: n = 58) each with a sterile file (size 20/0.06) in a single length technique. Only one specimen per tooth was included in the analysis; in multi-rooted teeth, the specimen with highest sequencing depth. After DNA extraction, the hypervariable region V4 of the bacterial 16 S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced (Illumina MiSeq). Taxonomy was assigned based on the expanded Human Oral Microbiome Database (eHOMD). Statistical analysis of diversity parameters comprised Mann-Whitney U tests and PERMANOVA. Compositional differences were evaluated by differential abundance analyses using DESeq2, LinDA, and ANCOM-BC2 methods.
resultsNo differences were observed in richness and diversity (Shannon diversity index) on the genus or ASV level (p > 0.05). According to PERMANOVA, SAP and AAP microbiomes did not differ significantly both on genus and ASV levels (p > 0.05). Among highly abundant genera, Fusobacterium was indicated to be more abundant in SAP samples whereas Actinomyces was more abundant in AAP samples.
conclusionsThe expression of clinical symptoms in apical periodontitis does not appear to be determined by specific microorganisms but may instead reflect shifts of the relative abundance of the microbial community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.