ReviewACS catalysis2026
Challenges and Opportunities of Pretrained Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials in Heterogeneous Catalysis.
Review in ACS catalysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the chemical space of transition-metal cluster thermodynamics via automated first-principles calculations and machine learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Reactivity of Gas-Phase Metal Clusters: Unlocking Mechanisms of Activation and Conversion of Small Molecules.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Thermal and Photocatalytic Conversion of COChemSusChem · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The design of catalysts gets its fundamental rationale from accurate and efficient modeling of reactivity on surfaces and materials. To reach this detailed atomistic understanding, density functional theory (DFT) has been the key computational technique. However, the emergence of machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) marks a significant paradigm shift, offering the potential to match DFT accuracy at a drastically reduced computational cost. This perspective provides an overview of state-of-the-art MLIPs for heterogeneous catalysis as "out-of-the-box" tools. We summarize the different families of MLIPs and their training processes and then apply these pretrained models to heterogeneous catalysis problems. Furthermore, we critically address the challenges of model transferability and integration in unified frameworks, underscoring the necessity for standardized protocols to benchmark performance across different architectures. Finally, we assess the capacity of pretrained models to democratize computational catalysis, highlighting the specific hurdles that remain in achieving reliable, predictive power for widespread use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.