ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
A multi-model fusion approach incorporating conventional radiological and machine learning features across age spectrum for periorbital fat status prediction.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop an ensemble learning model fusing conventional radiomics (CR) and machine learning (ML) features to assess periorbital fat status across the entire age spectrum. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on preoperative cranial and facial MRI data of meningioma patients. Patients were categorized into youth, middle-aged, and senior groups and allocated to training and test sets through stratified random sampling. CR and ML features of fat in three periorbital regions were extracted to develop an ensemble learning model, with its clinical application value subsequently evaluated. Results: 237 patients were enrolled: 165 in the training set and 72 in the test set. The training set comprised 19 youth cases (28.5 ± 5.0, 7 male), 41 middle-aged cases (42.9 ± 4.7, 9 male), and 105 senior cases (60.0 ± 6.5, 26 male). The test set included 8 youth cases (28.6 ± 5.6, 4 male), 18 middle-aged cases (43.9 ± 4.1, 6 male), and 46 senior cases (58.8 ± 6.7, 10 male). The ensemble learning model outperformed the CR model, the ML model, and the CR-ML fusion model on the test set, achieving an AUC-macro of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.737-0.902), an F1-score of 0.614, an accuracy (Acc) of 0.597, and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.690. Ensemble learning models demonstrated optimal comprehensive capabilities in multi-classification tasks, enhancing generalization and robustness. Conclusion: Our ensemble learning model achieved non-invasive and reliable assessment of periorbital fat status across the entire age spectrum, enriching the evaluation methodology for rejuvenation surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.