Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822873›Full record

ArticleRSC chemical biology2026

Comparative analysis of alkyne- and desthiobiotinylated photoaffinity probes for chemotranscriptomic profiling.

Daphne A L van den Homberg, Georgia Poulladofonou, Aurelia Dekens, Willem A Velema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC chemical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daphne A L van den HombergInstitute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135 6525 AJ Nijmegen The Netherlands willem.velema@ru.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-9470
Georgia PoulladofonouInstitute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135 6525 AJ Nijmegen The Netherlands willem.velema@ru.nl.
Aurelia DekensInstitute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135 6525 AJ Nijmegen The Netherlands willem.velema@ru.nl.
Willem A VelemaInstitute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135 6525 AJ Nijmegen The Netherlands willem.velema@ru.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0257-2734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding small molecule-RNA interactions is a crucial part in drug development and fundamental biology. Chemotranscriptomic profiling is emerging as a powerful platform to interrogate interactions of small molecules with entire transcriptomes. This technique relies on photoaffinity probes that covalently capture small molecule RNA interactions. Most photoaffinity probes bear an alkyne handle that requires additional inefficient functionalization and purification steps after RNA capture. We sought to improve the workflow by directly desthiobiotinylating a photoaffinity probe, omitting these additional alkyne functionalization steps. Here, we compare the suitability of desthiobiotin and alkyne modified Ribocil-derived photoaffinity probes for chemotranscriptomic profiling. Our results demonstrate binding of both photoaffinity probes to their specific target, the FMN riboswitch, using

Identifiers

PMID41822873
PMCPMC12977078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.