ArticleJournal of reproduction & infertility2025
Comparison of Long-Term and Stimulated Cycle Protocols in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of reproduction & infertility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the optimal endometrial preparation strategy for frozen embryo transfer (FET) remains unclear. This clinical trial aimed to compare a long-term protocol with a stimulated cycle protocol in FET cycles of PCOS women, with clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer as the primary outcome. Methods: This non-randomized, open-label, two-arm clinical trial was conducted at Fatemieh Hamedan Hospital, Iran, involving 340 women with PCOS. Participants were allocated to the long-term or stimulated cycle protocols based on clinical scheduling and physician decision. The long-term protocol included low-dose combined oral contraceptives for 14 days, GnRH agonist downregulation, estradiol valerate (4-6 Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (n=170 each). The long-term protocol showed higher clinical pregnancy rates (35.9%) compared to the stimulated cycle (22.9%) (OR=1.92; 95%CI: 1.15-3.19; p=0.011). Chemical pregnancy rates also favored the long-term protocol (34.7% Conclusion: Although the long-term protocol showed higher clinical pregnancy rates in unadjusted analyses, after adjusting for confounders, protocol type was not independently associated with clinical pregnancy. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings, and adverse outcomes should be assessed in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.