ArticleInternational journal of public health2026
Development and Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Social Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Scale in the Turkish Context: Evidence From Hatay Province.
Article in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital burnout in nursing: development of a valid and reliable scale to assess digital burnout associated with the digitalization process in nursing.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Impact of AI-Augmented informed consent on preoperative anxiety and patient understanding: A prospective Observational Study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The rapid spread of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has increased interest in how the public views and trusts these technologies. However, tools designed to measure these perceptions in the Turkish context remain limited. This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale to assess public perceptions of AI in healthcare. Methods: An initial set of 41 items was created based on the literature and expert input. Data were collected from 404 adults in Turkey and divided into two groups. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted in the first group, followed by confirmatory factor analysis in the second group to test the factor structure, validity, and reliability of the scale. Results: Exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale has a three-factor structure reflecting attitudes and acceptance, trust, and perceived usefulness. This structure explained 74.35% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported this model with an acceptable level of fit, and the results also showed that the scale had strong internal consistency. Conclusion: The SPAIHS is a psychometrically sound instrument for assessing public perceptions of AI in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.