ArticleFood science of animal resources2025
Consumer Preferences for Conventional Meat and Meat Alternatives.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the growing interest in non-animal-based protein sources, little is known about consumer preferences for new meat alternatives. This study examines consumer attitudes toward canned ham made from domestic Handon pork, lab-grown, and plant-based protein. Using choice experiment data from a nationwide online survey of 1,000 South Korean consumers, the results of a random parameter logit analysis indicate that the consumers have the highest mean willingness-to-pay for canned ham made from Handon pork and the lowest mean willingness-to-pay for lab-grown canned ham. Despite the growing interest in non-animal-based protein sources, consumers prefer real meat over other meat alternatives. Additionally, the results indicate that consumers have a lower level of subjective knowledge regarding meat alternatives, and more people oppose having meat alternatives labeled as "meat."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.