ReviewFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2026
The long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy experience and needs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative meta-synthesis.
Review in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To systematically evaluate and integrate the experience and perception of long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, Cochrane Library, VIP Database, WanFang, CNKI, and CBM Database for qualitative studies on the experience of long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy in patients with COPD was conducted. The time limit was from the database's inception to 1 August 2025. The qualitative meta-synthesis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 9 papers were included, and 33 outcomes were distilled into nine categories and four integrated outcomes: Health benefits of Long-Term Oxygen Therapy for patients with COPD, the patients with COPD faced many challenges after Long-Term Oxygen Therapy, adaptation to Long-Term Oxygen Therapy in patients with COPD, and the demands of patients with COPD undergoing Long-Term Oxygen Therapy. Although long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy for patients with COPD brings certain health benefits, they also face a series of problems and challenges. In the future, healthcare professionals should pay attention to the experience of long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy for patients with COPD and actively address its adverse effects. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251086510, PROSPERO CRD420251086510.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.