Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822745›Full record

ReviewAnnals of surgical treatment and research2026

Physical AI goes to the operating room: are we ready for the Surgical Data Factory?

Namkee Oh, Kyu-Hwan Jung, Gyu-Seong Choi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Namkee OhDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6594-8973
Kyu-Hwan JungClinical Robotics and Embodied AI Research Center, Smart Healthcare Research Institute, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-6800
Gyu-Seong ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2545-3105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The operating room remains a paradox: it is one of the most sensor-rich environments in the hospital, yet it produces largely underutilized data. While surgical artificial intelligence (AI) has achieved remarkable progress in recent years, the day-to-day practice of surgery has changed little, with most systems confined to passive decision support. This narrative review traces the evolution of surgical AI from perception to cognition to early forms of action, arguing that the next paradigm shift requires "physical AI"-systems capable of meaningful physical interaction and autonomous execution. The clinical motivation for pursuing physical AI is clear: surgical outcomes vary substantially across surgeons, access is constrained by workforce shortages, and high-quality care remains tied to the scarcity of human expertise. If reliable autonomous systems can be developed, surgery could become more standardized, scalable, and reproducible. However, a critical bottleneck persists: the scarcity of synchronized, multimodal training data. The fundamental barrier is environmental rather than algorithmic, as most operating rooms are not configured to measure surgical practice objectively. We propose reconceptualizing the operating room as a "Surgical Data Factory"-a closed-loop ecosystem designed to capture multimodal signals, structure them via consensus taxonomies linked to outcomes, and utilize them for training, validation, and monitoring. Surgeons must transition from passive users to active architects of this infrastructure. Investing in systematic data governance is the prerequisite for responsibly developing, validating, and scaling physical AI in surgery.

Indexed as

Embodied intelligencePhysical AIRobotic surgical procedureSurgical data factorySurgical scene understanding

Identifiers

PMID41822745
PMCPMC12978863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.