Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822726›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2024

A cost-of-illness study of eosinophilic esophagitis in Italy: assessing direct and indirect costs.

Agostino Fortunato, Debora Antonini, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino, Francesca Racca, Roberto Penagini, Francesca Fanelli, Jean Pierre Saab, Filippo Cipriani, Roberta Giodice, Filippo Rumi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Economic burden of eosinophilic esophagitis in the first year after diagnosis in Spain: A direct medical cost analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Agostino FortunatoAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS) - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Debora AntoniniAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS) - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Edoardo Vincenzo SavarinoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Francesca RaccaPersonalized Medicine, Asthma, and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Roberto PenaginiGastroenterolgy and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Cà Grande Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Francesca FanelliMarket Access Department, Sanofi S.p.A, Milan, Italy.
Jean Pierre SaabMarket Access Department, Sanofi S.p.A, Milan, Italy.
Filippo CiprianiMarket Access Department, Sanofi S.p.A, Milan, Italy.
Roberta GiodiceESEO Italia - Associazione di famiglie contro l'esofagite eosinofila, Rome, Italy.
Filippo RumiAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS) - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Americo CicchettiAlta Scuola di Economia e Management dei Sistemi Sanitari (ALTEMS) - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic and progressive type 2 inflammatory disease affecting the esophagus. Its prevalence has increased in recent years due to increased awareness, evolving clinical guidelines, and heightened sensitivity among healthcare professionals managing the condition. The exact causes behind EoE's development remain unknown, and its clinical presentation varies, often leading to significant diagnostic delays depending on the age at which symptoms manifest. Consequently, achieving long-term disease control through heightened awareness becomes imperative. EoE generates a significant clinical burden, resulting in substantial economic consequences for patients, healthcare systems, and society. This study aimed to assess the economic and social impacts on EoE patients within the Italian context. Methods: A cost-of-illness analysis was conducted from two perspectives: the National Health System (NHS) and the societal perspective. This analysis encompassed direct healthcare, indirect healthcare, and non-healthcare costs. Data were collected and assessed through a survey administered to a panel of expert clinicians and EoE-affected patients. Results: Managing EoE incurs a significant burden on healthcare systems, amounting to €6,852.28 per patient per year. The primary cost component appears to be direct costs, comprising 60.73% of the total cost per patient for this condition, while indirect costs contribute to 29.68% of the overall management expenses. Conclusion: This analysis underscores a substantial financial burden on both the healthcare system and patients affected by eosinophilic esophagitis. It emphasizes the imperative need for a continuous and combined effort from clinicians, patients, and families to promptly recognize symptoms and adaptive behavior to mitigate diagnostic delays.

Indexed as

cost-of-illness analysisdiagnostic delayeosinophilic esophagitissocial burdenunmet medical need

Identifiers

PMID41822726
PMCPMC12952465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.