ArticleFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2024
Treatment patterns in a real-world cohort of patients with Wilson disease in the United States.
Article in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative management practices of Wilson disease in Californian and Italian providers.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wilson disease (WD) is a rare and potentially fatal genetic disorder caused by accumulation of toxic levels of copper. Current treatments include chelating agents and/or zinc. We characterized real-world US treatment patterns in patients with WD. Methods: This retrospective, observational medical chart review utilized deidentified clinical data, including treatment patterns, abstracted from patient medical charts between 01/2012 and 06/2017. Line of therapy was assessed based on disease presentation and aggregated. Index treatment was defined as the first line of therapy, followed by second line of therapy and third line of therapy. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 225 patients were included (mean [SD] age at diagnosis: 24.7 [9.8] years). Initial disease presentation was both neurologic/psychiatric and hepatic in 52.9%, followed by neurologic/psychiatric (20.0%), hepatic (16.9%), and asymptomatic (10.2%). Median (first and third quartiles) duration of follow-up from diagnosis was 39.5 (33.8-60.4) months. The most common first line of therapy was penicillamine monotherapy in 45.5%, followed by trientine monotherapy (26.1%) and chelator/zinc combination therapy (21.2%). A total of 167/222 (75.2%) patients remained on first line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 13.5% who switched to second line of therapy, most changed to trientine monotherapy (53.3%). All those who switched to third line of therapy transitioned to zinc monotherapy (100.0%). Unexpectedly, 11.3% discontinued first line of therapy without transitioning to a subsequent therapy. The primary rationale for index monotherapy selection was improved efficacy (61.6%). Most discontinuations were due to side effects/tolerability (40.8%). Treatment patterns varied by initial disease presentation, practice setting, physician specialty, and geographic location. Conclusion: These results demonstrate a lack of consensus in the US regarding first-line treatment for patients with WD. Evidence-based treatment pathways informed by high-quality clinical trials for improved health outcomes are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.