ArticleFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2024
Neoplasia detection in FIT positive screening colonoscopies compared with an age-controlled symptomatic cohort: a retrospective review.
Article in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy following a positive FIT test in an average risk population is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. While lower gastrointestinal symptoms remain a common cause for referral for colonoscopy, symptoms are poor predictors of clinically significant disease. The study was performed to compare neoplasia detection FIT +ve individuals and age-matched symptomatic cohorts. A single centre retrospective observational study was performed including all index colonoscopies performed on patients aged 60-70 from January 2015 to September 2021. Diagnostic yield was reported as adenoma detection rate, SSL detection rate, detection of high risk finding or adenocarcinoma. 8,106 colonoscopies were performed on patients aged 60-70 years. 3,695 (45.6%) originated from screening (FIT +ve). With exclusion criteria applied, 2,640 (59.9%) for screening and 1,767 (40.1%) for symptomatic patients were included. Median age in screening was 65 years (IQR 62-67) and 64 years in the symptomatic group (IQR 62-68), with male predominance in both groups (n=1,536, 58.1%, n=944, 53.4%). There were significant differences in both the ADR (56% vs 26.3%, p<0.01) and the SSLDR (10.4% vs. 8.1%, p=0.05) in the screening cohort compared to the symptomatic group. High risk findings (21.3% vs. 7.5%, p<0.01) were significantly more prevalent in the screening group with a considerably higher colorectal cancer (4.7% vs. 0.9%, p=<0.001) detection rate. FIT based triage significantly outperforms symptom based investigation for individuals in the 60-70 age group. Patients should be preferentially referred to organised colorectal cancer screening. FIT can be performed on symptomatic patients, to identify low risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.