Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822711›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2024

Neoplasia detection in FIT positive screening colonoscopies compared with an age-controlled symptomatic cohort: a retrospective review.

Neil O'Morain, Roisin Stack, Jayne Doherty, Blathnaid Nolan, Parker Girod, Lakshman Kumar, Mark McCrossan, Elaine Joy, Orlaith Casey, Gareth Horgan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Neil O'MorainCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Roisin StackCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Jayne DohertyCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Blathnaid NolanCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Parker GirodCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Lakshman KumarCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark McCrossanCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Elaine JoySchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Orlaith CaseySchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gareth HorganCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Glen DohertyCentre for Colorectal Disease, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy following a positive FIT test in an average risk population is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality. While lower gastrointestinal symptoms remain a common cause for referral for colonoscopy, symptoms are poor predictors of clinically significant disease. The study was performed to compare neoplasia detection FIT +ve individuals and age-matched symptomatic cohorts. A single centre retrospective observational study was performed including all index colonoscopies performed on patients aged 60-70 from January 2015 to September 2021. Diagnostic yield was reported as adenoma detection rate, SSL detection rate, detection of high risk finding or adenocarcinoma. 8,106 colonoscopies were performed on patients aged 60-70 years. 3,695 (45.6%) originated from screening (FIT +ve). With exclusion criteria applied, 2,640 (59.9%) for screening and 1,767 (40.1%) for symptomatic patients were included. Median age in screening was 65 years (IQR 62-67) and 64 years in the symptomatic group (IQR 62-68), with male predominance in both groups (n=1,536, 58.1%, n=944, 53.4%). There were significant differences in both the ADR (56% vs 26.3%, p<0.01) and the SSLDR (10.4% vs. 8.1%, p=0.05) in the screening cohort compared to the symptomatic group. High risk findings (21.3% vs. 7.5%, p<0.01) were significantly more prevalent in the screening group with a considerably higher colorectal cancer (4.7% vs. 0.9%, p=<0.001) detection rate. FIT based triage significantly outperforms symptom based investigation for individuals in the 60-70 age group. Patients should be preferentially referred to organised colorectal cancer screening. FIT can be performed on symptomatic patients, to identify low risk individuals.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercolorectal cancer screeningfithigh risk findingslower gastrointestinal symptoms

Identifiers

PMID41822711
PMCPMC12952400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.