ReviewCureus2026
Liver Biopsy in Metabolic-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: Accuracy, Challenges, and Alternatives.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a common medical condition that can progress to metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and advanced fibrosis, leading to severe outcomes. Liver biopsy continues to be the diagnostic gold standard; however, its accuracy and clinical utility in MASLD are subject to debate. Biopsy is also invasive and carries procedural risks. This contemporary narrative review examines the limitations of liver biopsy in MASLD and explores noninvasive alternatives. Our findings indicate that the diagnostic reliability of liver biopsy is limited by sampling error and by variability in tissue adequacy. Interobserver variability further adds to challenges in histological interpretation. Demographic factors and comorbid conditions significantly contribute to the misclassification of disease severity. Among well-established noninvasive tests, transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) assess larger liver volume and demonstrate dependable accuracy in detecting fibrosis, though both have implicit limitations. In conclusion, liver biopsy remains paramount in select clinical cases. Although current guidelines recommend noninvasive tests as first-line assessment tools in MASLD and MASH, no single approach is suitable for all patients. Future evaluation strategies should prioritize patient-centered assessments accounting for the multifactorial nature of MASLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.