ArticleCureus2026
Evaluating Laparoscopic Simulation Training for Preclinical Osteopathic Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To assess the effectiveness of a laparoscopic simulation training program using LAPARO medical simulators in enhancing the surgical skills competency and confidence of osteopathic medical students. Background Pre-clinical education significantly influences the professional development of future physicians. Early exposure to laparoscopic techniques can help medical students explore surgical interests and develop skills for clerkships and future careers. Methods Participants performed three LAPARO simulation modules: Beads, Cones, and Pegs. Their best times from two attempts each in February and May 2024 were recorded. Attempts exceeding four minutes were classified as failures. Participants attended multiple practice sessions between assessments. In addition, a Qualtrics survey comprising nine questions was administered to evaluate interest in surgery, perceived skill development, and attitudes toward laparoscopic training. Results The study found that 83.33% of participants improved in at least one module. There was a 62.1% reduction in failure rates from initial to final assessments. In the Beads module, the initial failure rate was 100%, decreasing to 66.67% with a final average time of 3:11, a 34% reduction. For the Cones module, the initial failure rate was 47.37%, improving to 16.67% with an average time decrease from 2:59 to 2:31 (15.65% improvement). In this module, 75% improved their times, and three participants achieved times under two minutes. The Pegs module had an initial failure rate of 5.26%, which increased slightly to 8.33%, but the average time improved from 2:34 to 2:27 (4.55% reduction). Sub-two-minute completions increased from 15.79% to 33.33%, with 58.33% improving their times. Significant improvement was observed in the Cones module (p = 0.0036), with overall trends across all modules suggesting enhanced performance following practice, reinforcing the educational impact of laparoscopic simulation training. Survey data revealed strong positive perceptions: 93.2% of respondents agreed that the laparoscopic events increased their interest in laparoscopic surgery, 81.8% reported greater interest in general surgery, and 81.9% felt more comfortable with their laparoscopic skills for clinical rotations. Conclusion Objective performance improvements and positive survey responses collectively demonstrate that early laparoscopic simulation training may enhance technical proficiency, confidence, and enthusiasm for surgical careers among pre-clinical osteopathic medical students. These findings support the early integration of simulation into pre-clinical medical education and highlight its dual role in developing skills and fostering surgical interest. Further research is needed to explore the long-term benefits and potential applications of such training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.