ArticleCureus2026
Palmar Cutaneous Erythematous Macules: A Case Report of an Atypical Presentation of Chilblain Lupus Erythematosus.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) manifests with a broad spectrum of cutaneous manifestations, including chilblain lupus erythematosus (CHLE), which typically presents as cold-induced, painful acral lesions with specific dermatoscopic and histopathologic features. We describe an unusual case of a 32-year-old woman with established SLE and stage IV lupus nephritis who presented with a five-year history of asymptomatic, recurrent erythematous macules on the palms. The patient reported no cold sensitivity, pain, or Raynaud's phenomenon, which are hallmark features of classic CHLE. Physical examination revealed irregularly shaped pink macules and patches on the volar aspect of the fingers and thumb base and dorsal hands, sparing the palms. Dermoscopy showed well-demarcated, non-scaling pink macules with nonspecific white dots and sparing of palmar skin lines. Histopathological analysis demonstrated superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates with increased dermal mucin. Direct immunofluorescence revealed granular IgM and IgG deposits at the dermoepidermal junction, supporting a lupus-related process. Although the patient met the histopathologic and minor clinical criteria for CHLE, the absence of cold triggers and pain suggests an atypical presentation of CHLE or a distinct variant of lupus-associated palmar macules. Differential diagnoses, including dermatomyositis and small-vessel vasculitis, were excluded through clinical and laboratory evaluations. This case highlights the clinical variability of cutaneous lupus and the diagnostic challenges posed by palmar lesions that do not strictly adhere to established diagnostic criteria for CHLE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.