ArticleFrontiers in research metrics and analytics2026
Ubuntu as a blueprint: learning ethical transdisciplinarity from African indigenous knowledge systems.
Article in Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reimagining oral health professionalism in Africa: a narrative from the margins.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This perspective paper posits that the modern global pursuit of transdisciplinarity finds a time-tested blueprint in African Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS). It argues that principles such as holism, relationality, and respect, which are intrinsic to philosophies like Ubuntu, are not merely complementary but are essential for conducting ethical, effective, and community-engaged research. The paper offers a critical analysis of the risk of epistemic injustice within contemporary transdisciplinary projects, where ingrained academic power structures can perpetuate extractive and colonial research paradigms. Using the World Health Organization's ethical framework for traditional medicine research as a scaffold, we demonstrate how core tenets of ethical research, including co-creation, fair benefit-sharing, and methodological pluralism, are long-standing, embedded practices within diverse IKS across Africa. We caution against the romanticization or monolithic application of any single IKS, emphasizing the continent's epistemological diversity. By studying and honoring African IKS with nuance and respect, the global research community can move beyond tokenistic participation to achieve genuinely equitable, respectful, and impactful scientific outcomes that are co-created for the common good. This journey requires the decolonization of research methodologies and the critical integration of indigenous paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.