Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822554›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026

Patient perspective of Hesitancies and strategies to increase cancer clinical trial participation.

Bre-Anne Fifield, Allison Baker, Omer Elkhidir, Nick Philbin, Isabelle Hinch, Nora McVinnie, Amy Llancari, Claudia Pecoraro, Mahsa Rahimi, Tiana Visconti and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bre-Anne FifieldBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Allison BakerBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Omer ElkhidirBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Nick PhilbinBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Isabelle HinchBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Nora McVinnieUniversity College Dublin, Ireland.
Amy LlancariBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Claudia PecoraroBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Mahsa RahimiBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Tiana ViscontiBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.
Alexandra ShoustWonderBroads Windsor Essex Breast Cancer Survivor Dragon Boat Team, Canada.
Suzanne McMurphyDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology, and Criminology, University of Windsor Faculty of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, Canada.
Kendall SoucieWE-SPARK Health Institute, Canada.
Caroline HammWE-SPARK Health Institute, Canada.
Lisa A PorterBiomedical Sciences, University of Windsor Faculty of Science, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-1712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Strategies to improve accrual and reduce barriers to cancer clinical trials participation are critical for the advancement and implementation of new treatments and processes to improve cancer patient outcomes. While researchers have identified several barriers to accrual from the perspective of health care providers and patients, mechanisms to address and alleviate these concerns are needed to increase participation and interest in clinical trials. Methods: A focus group of 9 people with lived experience of a cancer diagnosis were accrued randomly and provided with a hands-on research experience and educational resources about clinical trials, followed by a focused group discussion to capture perspectives and/or experiences with clinical trials. Focus groups were transcribed and analyzed via Braun & Clarke's 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Five key themes were identified as important to increase clinical trial accrual. These included a patient-centered approach, easily digestible educational resources, a personalized understanding of motivating factors, local outreach, and transparency on outcomes and progress of the work. Qualitative input also identified methods that could positively influence accrual rates. Conclusions: Providing participants with opportunities to see first-hand how research works and data are used was noted as an overwhelmingly positive experience that could improve clinical trial accrual rates. This work confirms several previous findings with respect to patient identified barriers to participation in clinical trials and provides support and a framework for development of knowledge translation strategies to increase awareness and knowledge of the importance of clinical research to improve health outcomes for cancer patients.

Indexed as

clinical trialscommunicationknowledge translationPatientpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID41822554
PMCPMC12975619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.