ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
Developing the future clinical research workforce: An immersive high school clinical research summer camp.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical translational research relies on clinical research professional staff, and efforts to stimulate a future workforce has included outreach to high schools. Methods: We assembled a multidisciplinary team from three institutions, leveraging expertise in education, clinical translational science, and team science to design and implement a summer camp for high school students to expose them to career opportunities in clinical research. Using backward design, we developed structured lesson plans and logistical operations. Recruitment targeted rising sophomores and juniors from Columbus, Ohio, metropolitan area high schools, with a blinded review process and no grade point averages requirement to encourage broad participation. Evaluation included pre/post assessments, facilitator feedback, and daily safety checks, with IRB exemption secured for toolkit development and dissemination. Results: Within one month, we received 100 applications from 14 schools, far exceeding expectations, and selected 34 students from 8 Columbus, Ohio, metropolitan area high schools. Of the 34 accepted, 33 participated in most elements of the program and 29 students completed all four days of camp and post-camp evaluations, with an average self-reported goal achievement score of 8.41 out of 10. Pre- and post-test results showed statistically significant increases in confidence across clinical research topics. Discussion/conclusion: The pilot summer camp for high school students, supported by in-kind contributions, successfully met its goals and led to the creation of a replicable summer camp toolkit. The camp laid a strong foundation for future offerings and collaborations, with ongoing efforts to secure funding and expand access and impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.