Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822547›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

From response-to-routine: embedding humanitarian supply evaluation in Singapore's health and community care systems.

Huay Ling Tay, Chuan De Foo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huay Ling TaySchool of Business, Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore, Singapore.
Chuan De FooDuke NUS Medical School, NUS Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Singapore's ageing population and exposure to climate-related and pandemic risks demand a health system that is not only efficient but also inherently resilient to shocks and equitable in health service delivery. Policies need to address the current supply chain evaluations in public health to focus on cost and speed of healthcare delivery to close critical gaps in preparedness during times of sudden disruptions. Embedding a humanitarian perspective in public healthcare systems provides frameworks for resilience, equity, and sustainability. Yet these principles remain siloed from routine health governance. This policy brief argues for embedding humanitarian supply evaluation into Singapore's health and community care systems through a "Response-to-Routine" paradigm. We propose an implementable four-dimensional framework: Resilience & Equity, Climate & Sustainability, Governance & Collaboration, and Innovation & Learning, supported by scenario-based stress testing and community-level integration. This approach designed for policy level decision making ensures continuity of care for vulnerable populations, particularly older adults, while aligning with climate and health equity goals. Importantly, policymakers should institutionalise resilience audits and pilot integrated evaluation models in the existing healthcare landscape through a logistics and health systems lens.

Indexed as

ageing populationclimate adaptationcommunity carehealth securityhealth systems resiliencehumanitarian supply chainSingapore

Identifiers

PMID41822547
PMCPMC12975868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.