ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
From response-to-routine: embedding humanitarian supply evaluation in Singapore's health and community care systems.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Singapore's ageing population and exposure to climate-related and pandemic risks demand a health system that is not only efficient but also inherently resilient to shocks and equitable in health service delivery. Policies need to address the current supply chain evaluations in public health to focus on cost and speed of healthcare delivery to close critical gaps in preparedness during times of sudden disruptions. Embedding a humanitarian perspective in public healthcare systems provides frameworks for resilience, equity, and sustainability. Yet these principles remain siloed from routine health governance. This policy brief argues for embedding humanitarian supply evaluation into Singapore's health and community care systems through a "Response-to-Routine" paradigm. We propose an implementable four-dimensional framework: Resilience & Equity, Climate & Sustainability, Governance & Collaboration, and Innovation & Learning, supported by scenario-based stress testing and community-level integration. This approach designed for policy level decision making ensures continuity of care for vulnerable populations, particularly older adults, while aligning with climate and health equity goals. Importantly, policymakers should institutionalise resilience audits and pilot integrated evaluation models in the existing healthcare landscape through a logistics and health systems lens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.