ArticleFrontiers in adolescent medicine2025
Network topology and cannabis use following two weeks of monitored abstinence: moderation of sex and patterns of use findings.
Article in Frontiers in adolescent medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Altered reward-related resting-state network properties in adolescent cannabis use and depression.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Chronic cannabis use (CU) can result in subtle deficits in cognitive performance that may be linked with alterations in underlying neural functioning. However, these network alterations are not well-characterized following monitored abstinence. Here, we evaluate differences in functional brain network activity associated with CU patterns in adolescents/young adults. Methods: Functional connectomes were generated using resting-state fMRI data collected from 83 healthy young adults (44 male) following two weeks of monitored cannabis abstinence. Network topology metrics were calculated for each of the 7 Yeo 2011 intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) and on the whole-brain level. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate whether CU (regular-users, n = 35 vs. non-using controls, n = 40) was associated with network topology metric differences after controlling for past-year alcohol use, age, sex, and cotinine levels; moderation by sex was also investigated. Regressions were run within CU group to test for associations between cannabis use patterns (lifetime CU, age of CU initiation, and past-year CU) and network topology. Finally, a network-based statistic (NBS) approach was used to search for connectome subcomponents associated with CU group, CU*sex, and patterns of CU. Results: No significant association between CU groups and ICN topology was observed. Sex moderation was observed; within male cannabis users, higher past-year CU was associated with significantly higher frontoparietal and ventral attention network (VAN) efficiency. Within female cannabis users, higher past-year CU was associated with significantly lower Default Mode Network assortativity. Within individuals who initiated CU before the age of 17, males had lower assortativity in the VAN and Somatomotor network. NBS analyses indicated that connectivity strength within a primarily right-lateralized subnetwork distributed throughout the connectome was significantly and reliably associated with past-year CU). Conclusion: The present findings suggest that subtle differences in resting-state network topology associated with CU may persist after an extended period of abstinence in young adults, particularly males, especially those with heavier past-year use and those who initiated CU earlier in life. While further replication is required in larger samples, these findings suggest potential neuroimaging correlates underlying long-term changes in brain network topology associated with CU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.