ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Evidence of the Utility of Needle-Free Injectable Devices for Subcutaneous Administration of Biopharmaceuticals: Comparable Study of in vivo Pharmacological and Vaccination Ability to Normal Injection.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Needle-free injectable (NFI) technology has attracted increasing attention as a promising alternative to conventional needle-based injections. NFI devices offer several advantages, including reduced pain, minimized medical waste, and the elimination of needlestick injury risks. However, quantitative evidence comparing their pharmacological performance with that of standard subcutaneous (SC) injections remains limited, particularly for different biopharmaceuticals. Methods: We compared a novel NFI device (SAIJECT Results: There was no significant difference in the pharmacological activities of insulin and OVA delivered via the NFI-device and those via standard SC injection, suggesting that the NFI device was comparable to normal injection. Evans blue dye injected by the NFI device was broadly distributed throughout the dermis and subcutaneous tissue without skin perforation, leakage, or localized accumulation. These results indicate that NFI device can deliver drugs efficiently into the subcutaneous tissue while maintaining tissue integrity. Moreover, this NFI device exhibited negligible drug adsorption, indicating favorable physicochemical compatibility. Conclusion: These findings provide direct evidence supporting the applicability of NFI technology for the SC delivery of biopharmaceuticals and highlight the potential of the NFI devices as a practical and effective alternative to conventional needle-based injection methods. In addition, this comprehensive evaluation of NFI devices provides fundamental insights for the translational application of NFI devices as a practical alternative to needle-based injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.