ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2026
Self-administered Follow-up Using a Low-sensitivity Pregnancy Test after Medical Abortion: Results of a Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial.
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In Germany, follow-up after medical abortion is typically conducted via ultrasound examination. International evidence suggests that self-administered follow-up using low-sensitivity pregnancy tests may be a safe and acceptable alternative. This study assessed the effectiveness and acceptability of this approach within the German healthcare system. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, partially randomized, patient preference study conducted in 11 German centers (March-September 2024) involving 312 women, participants with strong preferences could choose their preferred follow-up method, while all others were randomized to either self-testing or ultrasound follow-up. Follow-up was performed using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test (1000 mIU/ml) at home or by ultrasound examination in the clinic. The primary outcome was the detection of ongoing pregnancies; patient satisfaction was assessed as a secondary outcome. Results: The detection rate of ongoing pregnancies was 100% in both groups. Specificity was 92.7% in the self-testing group and 100% in the ultrasound group. Complications were rare and occurred at similar rates in both groups. Discordant cases were rare and mainly represented false-positive results with faint test lines near the cut-off; severe complications did not occur more frequently. Satisfaction with the follow-up method was slightly lower in the self-testing group (85.9%) compared to the ultrasound group (98.3%) but remained within an acceptable range. Subjective feelings of safety were high in both groups. Conclusion: Self-administered follow-up using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test is a safe and well-accepted alternative to ultrasound examination after medical abortion. It may improve access to follow-up care, particularly for women living in underserved or remote areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.