Observational studyFrontiers in immunology2026
Beneficial effects of upadacitinib on a subgroup of patients with atopic dermatitis and hidradenitis suppurativa: a multicenter, real-world retrospective study.
Observational study in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Atopic Dermatitis Beyond the Skin Barrier: Precision Medicine Approaches to Immunological Profiling and Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although AD and HS are significantly different clinically, they share common systemic comorbidities and some immunological pathways. The aim of this multicentric Italian retrospective study is to assess therapeutic effects of upadacitinib on concomitant HS in AD patients. Materials and methods: Multicentric, observational, real-life retrospective study on 195 patients with moderate to severe AD treated with upadacitinib. Specifically, a subgroup analysis of AD+HS patients was conducted. Demographic, clinical data, outcome measures (EASI, NRS itch, sleep and pain, DLQI POEM and ADCT) were collected at baseline (week 0) and at subsequent time points (week 4, week 16, week 32, and week 52). Additionally, IHS4 IHS4-55 and HiSCR were the tools used to evaluate the clinical course of HS in the AD+HS subgroup. Results: A total of 195 AD patients were included, 7 (3,6%) patients also suffered of concomitant HS. In the AD+HS subgroup, mean IHS4 decreased from 6.9 ± 4.3 at baseline to 2.2 ± 1.8 at week 16 and 0.2 ± 0.5 at week 32. Reductions of mean baseline severity of HS tool (IHS4) score was detected as early as after only 4 weeks of treatment. Accordingly, HiSCR and HIS4-S5 were achieved by 4/7 patients at week 4, 5/6 at week 16, and 4/4 at week 32. Discussion: In the AD+HS subgroup, improvements were observed for both AD and HS-specific outcomes. Our data, although preliminary, show that upadacitinib could be a valid therapeutic choice in the treatment of patients with AD and concomitant HS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.