Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822451›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

Inverse hysteresis effects in a real and virtual environment.

Christoph Schütz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christoph SchützFaculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In sequential, repetitive motor tasks such as opening a stack of drawers, we tend to reuse prior motor plans to reduce cognitive load. This persistence, termed motor hysteresis, has been demonstrated in discrete reaching movements but not in discrete full-body movements. If hysteresis reflects a general principle of cost reduction, it should also manifest in full-body movements. To test this, we asked participants to perform a discrete full-body posture selection task: passing through apertures of varying widths. Width was varied in ordered sequences to induce hysteresis and body rotation was measured. To test whether full-body tasks, which require considerable space, scientific equipment, and personnel, could be conducted more efficiently in a virtual reality (VR) setup, we faithfully reproduced the task in VR with a second group of participants. Results showed that participants walked straight through wider apertures but initiated body rotation below a critical width. The critical width shifted with order, suggesting an inverse hysteresis effect. This inverse hysteresis was confirmed in the second participant group in the virtual environment. However, VR participants rotated at wider apertures, indicating a more cautious behavior. Comparable behavioral patterns across environments support the feasibility of VR for full-body movement studies. Nevertheless, validating critical findings in a real environment seems advisable. The observed inverse hysteresis has only been described in perception research so far, where it indicates repetition suppression. Our findings suggest that repetition suppression may also apply to motor planning, especially when mechanical costs are high.

Indexed as

full-body movementhysteresismotor planningposture selectionreal environmentvirtual environmentvisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID41822451
PMCPMC12977077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.