ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychological safety in interdisciplinary teams: how leadership behaviors empower teams.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Interdisciplinary collaboration drives innovation by uniting diverse knowledge and perspectives. However, bias and ineffective team management practices can hinder a team's ability to leverage these advantages by causing interpersonal conflict, eroding trust, and compromising communication. These challenges reinforce the need for leadership skills that extend beyond team management practices that focus on coordination and task execution, emphasizing the relational work required to cultivate healthy team dynamics. By equipping leaders with tools to foster stronger team cultures, teams are better positioned to integrate unique perspectives, unlocking the full potential of their collective expertise. Methods: Taking a phenomenological approach, eight senior leaders with extensive experience in leadership and mentoring were interviewed to learn more about their experiences in promoting psychological safety in teams. Transcripts were coded using thematic analysis during multiple coding iterations. Results: The behaviors described by interviewed leaders fell into five thematic areas: self-awareness and growth, mentorship and development, amplification and empowerment, communication and transparency, and accountability and integrity. Discussion: This study underscores the transformative power of leadership in cultivating strong team cultures while also complementing and strengthening existing leadership-training efforts. Leadership development programs could be strengthened by attending more explicitly to psychological safety, and our findings provide actionable insights that can be integrated into current training frameworks to deepen leaders' capacity to foster supportive and high-functioning teams. Ultimately, this shift not only benefits individual teams but has the potential to strengthen the fabric of the broader research culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.