ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Kicking the mental number line: a kinematic investigation of numerical processing in childhood.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing body of evidence in adults indicates bidirectional interactions between numerical processing and motor execution, often interpreted as the result of sensorimotor experiences linking numerical magnitude to physical size and action parameters. However, the developmental trajectory of number-action coupling, particularly for non-symbolic numerosities, remains largely unexplored. In the present study, we provide a developmental extension of a kinematic paradigm originally introduced in adults to investigate whether observing non-symbolic numerical stimuli modulates motor performance in preschool (4-6 years) and school-age (7-11 years) children. Using an engaging finger-kick task, we measured fine-grained kinematic parameters while children responded to small (2-Dots) or large (8-Dots) dot arrays, as well as to a non-numerical baseline stimulus. Preschoolers exhibited more efficient movement trajectories after observing small numerosities compared to the baseline condition, together with greater leftward trajectory deviations-consistent with a spatial-numerical mapping aligned with the Mental Number Line. In contrast, no kinematic modulation was observed following exposure to large numerosities, and no reliable numerical effects emerged in school-age children, mirroring patterns previously reported in adults. Taken together, these findings suggest that non-symbolic spatial-numerical mappings can directly influence action execution early in development, but may be reshaped or attenuated with increasing experience and formal education. By combining non-symbolic number processing with precise kinematic measures in children, the present study sheds light on early number-action links and their developmental reorganization, offering insights into the foundations of numerical cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.