Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822410›Full record

ArticleSocial indicators research2026

Evaluating a 'UBI Plus' Intervention: A Needs-based Analysis of WorkFREE.

Joel Lazarus, Sarath Davala, Maria Franchi, Neil Howard, Nick Langridge, Santosh Malviya, Vibhor Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social indicators research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joel LazarusDepartment of Social and Policy Sciences, 3 East, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3410-9613
Sarath DavalaIndia Network for Basic Income, Securanderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500015 India.
Maria FranchiDepartment of Social and Policy Sciences, 3 East, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK.
Neil HowardDepartment of Social and Policy Sciences, 3 East, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2328-8230
Nick LangridgeDepartment of Social and Policy Sciences, 3 East, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK.ORCID 0009-0000-8183-5664
Santosh MalviyaIndia Network for Basic Income, Securanderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana 500015 India.
Vibhor MathurDepartment of Social and Policy Sciences, 3 East, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0500-5770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As pilots in Universal Basic Income (UBI) pilots proliferate, there is increasing recognition that cash alone may not be enough to support envisioned transformation. Consequently, recent years have seen pilots in 'UBI Plus' - combinations of unconditional cash transfers with other social interventions. In this article, we present a mixed-methods needs-based evaluation of WorkFREE, a major UBI Plus pilot. Between 2020 and 2024, WorkFREE brought together UK and Indian researchers, a local NGO, and over 1,400 slum residents (295 households) in city name, India. WorkFREE participants received monthly unconditional cash transfers for eighteen months whilst participating in regular needs-focused 'Plus meetings'. This article's authors oversaw the design, implementation, and evaluation of WorkFREE both as a research project and pilot intervention. Locating human needs at an essential layer of existence and experience, we conducted all stages and aspects of our work using a needs-based approach. In this article, we use Manfred Max-Neef's (1991) framework of fundamental human needs to evaluate WorkFREE's UBI Plus pilot through a combination of quantitative data from three household surveys conducted over eighteen months and qualitative data conducted with participants over two years. We find compelling evidence that points to the synergic power of UBI Plus in supporting participants to more effectively and extensively meet not just their material, but also their psychological and relational needs. We recognise limits to our model and implementation - particularly with regard to responding to social, especially gendered, difference - but see enough evidence to advocate for UBI Plus and for needs-based approaches to research and social interventions.

Indexed as

NeedsProject EvaluationUniversal Basic Income

Identifiers

PMID41822410
PMCPMC12975856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.