Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822404›Full record

ArticleEplasty2025

Comparison of Surgical Complications in Staged Versus Combined Hysterectomy Approach in Masculinizing Bottom Surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

Oluwaseun D Adebagbo, Micaela J Tobin, John B Park, Benjamin Rahmani, Sasha Nickman, Macie Gettings, Supraja Rajagopalan, Marissa A Kent, Ryan P Cauley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eplasty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oluwaseun D AdebagboDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Micaela J TobinDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
John B ParkDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Benjamin RahmaniDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sasha NickmanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Macie GettingsDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Supraja RajagopalanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Fenway Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marissa A KentDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ryan P CauleyDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Masculinizing (female-to-male) gender-affirming bottom surgeries (GABS) commonly include hysterectomies and can be performed in a staged manner or at the time of masculinizing genital surgery. Prior studies with small patient cohorts have suggested that adopting a combined approach increases the likelihood of complications. This study aimed to characterize patients undergoing gender-affirming masculinizing genital surgery with and without concurrent hysterectomies and determine whether there were additive risks of concurrent procedures. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients with International Classification of Diseases-9/-10 gender dysphoria diagnoses who underwent masculinizing GABS (intersex for female to male, simple or complex scrotoplasty) from 2012 to 2022. Stratified by the presence of a concurrent hysterectomy, baseline characteristics, preoperative commodities, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between single-stage GABS and those with concurrent hysterectomy. Results: Of the 113 total patients included, 83 (73.5%) patients had a single-stage GABS and 30 (26.6%) patients had a GABS combined with hysterectomy. Baseline characteristics, including age, gender distribution, and preoperative comorbidities, were comparable between groups. The median operative time and hospital length of stay were similar between groups. However, single-stage GABS patients had higher rates of return to the operating room (14.5% vs 0.0%, Conclusions: The results suggest that performing hysterectomies at the time of masculinizing GABS can be safe in appropriately selected patients. These findings highlight the potential safety benefits of combining GABS with hysterectomy and underscore the need for further research into optimizing outcomes for diverse patient populations, as a combined approach may improve efficiency, aid access to care, and improve patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Bottom SurgeryGender Affirming SurgeryGenital SurgeryHysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID41822404
PMCPMC12975527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.