Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822393›Full record

ArticleEplasty2025

Congenital Upper Extremity Anomalies Misdiagnosed as Ulnar Longitudinal Deficiency.

N K Sferopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eplasty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

N K Sferopoulos2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "G. Gennimatas" Hospital, 546 35, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with a congenital hand plate or upper limb anomaly, a dysplastic ulna, or a syndrome may present with morphologic forms commonly misdiagnosed as ulnar longitudinal deficiency (ULD). Methods: Patients who had been misdiagnosed with ULD over the past 35 years were identified from the hospital database. Twenty-six patients with photographs and/or conventional radiographs that could be adequately reproduced were enrolled in the study. Results: In 16 unilateral cases, the final diagnosis changed to symbrachydactyly (6 cases), Poland syndrome (3 cases), transverse deficiency (1 case), radial longitudinal deficiency (2 cases), and congenital pseudarthrosis of the ulna with osteolysis in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (4 cases). In 10 bilateral cases, the final diagnosis changed to constriction ring sequence (3 cases), brachydactyly (6 cases), and congenital bilateral negative ulnar variance in a patient with central metacarpal medullary stenosis. This research presents the findings of the 7 most illustrative cases and focuses on their differential diagnosis. Additionally, the literature review summarizes the most common congenital anomalies included in the differential diagnosis of ULD, presenting their clinical and/or radiographic features as detected in patients referred to our service. Conclusions: A detailed evaluation of patients with even simple unilateral congenital hand or upper limb anomalies is invaluable to the diagnostic investigation. The treating pediatrician, clinician, or surgeon should also be sufficiently familiar with the clinical and radiographic features of congenital anomalies and the long list of syndrome-related deficiencies that the differential diagnostic process of ULD includes. Missed or misinterpreted findings in patients with congenital hand or upper limb anomalies, usually recorded after single diagnosis documentation, may result in a misdiagnosis of ULD and delayed detection of associated congenital, medical, or syndromal disorders.

Indexed as

Congenital Hand And Upper Limb AnomaliesDifferential DiagnosisMisdiagnosisUlnar Longitudinal Deficiency

Identifiers

PMID41822393
PMCPMC12975524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.