Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822381›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology artificial intelligence2025

Deep learning-based detection and segmentation of osseous metastatic prostate cancer lesions on computed tomography.

S J Pawan, Joseph Matthew Rich, Shreyas Malewar, Daksh Patel, Matt Muellner, Darryl Hwang, Xiaomeng Lei, Steven Cen, Timothy Triche, Amir Goldkorn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TCIA Radiology Image Processing for AI and Radiomics.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Radiomics and Back Pain.Global spine journal · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

S J PawanDepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joseph Matthew RichRadiomics Lab, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Shreyas MalewarRadiomics Lab, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daksh PatelRadiomics Lab, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Matt MuellnerRadiomics Lab, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Darryl HwangRadiomics Lab, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Xiaomeng LeiDepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Steven CenDepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Timothy TricheCenter for Personalized Medicine, Dept of Pathology and Laboratory medicine, Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amir GoldkornDepartment of Medicine and Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center & Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Passant MohamedDepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Assad OberaiDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vinay DuddalwarDepartment of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Integrated radiomic and liquid biopsy monitoring in SWOG S1802: A phase 3 therapeutic trial for metastatic prostate cancerR01CA257610 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DUDDALWAR, VINAY, GOLDKORN, AMIR · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
USC/CHLA Summer Oncology Research Fellowship (SORF) Program for Medical StudentsR25CA225513 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI ANAT ERDREICH-EPSTEIN, WIJBE MARTIN KAST · 2019 to 2026
$1.7M
Early tumorigenesis in vivo imaging, scRNA-seq to functional assaysR21CA267849 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI FRASER, SCOTT E, GOLDKORN, AMIR · 2022 to 2023
$420k
RNA Methylation in Cancer Plasticity and Drug ResistanceF30CA257401 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HODARA, EMMANUELLE · 2021 to 2025
$275k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA257401NCI NIH HHS R01 CA257610NCI NIH HHS R21 CA267849NCI NIH HHS R25 CA225513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate adenocarcinoma frequently metastasizes to bone and is detected via computed tomography (CT) scans. Accurate detection and segmentation of these lesions are critical for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring. This study aims to automate lesion detection and segmentation using deep learning models. Methods and Materials: We evaluated deep learning models for lesion detection (EfficientNet, ResNet34, DenseNet) and segmentation (nnUNetv2, UNet, ResUNet, ResAttUNet). Performance metrics included F1 score, precision, recall, Area Under the Curve (AUC), and Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Pairwise t-tests compared segmentation accuracy. Radiomic analyses compared lesions segmented by deep learning to manual segmentations. Results: EfficientNet achieved the highest detection performance, with an F1 score of 0.82, precision of 0.88, recall of 0.79, and AUC of 0.71. Among segmentation models, nnUNetv2 performed best, achieving a DSC of 0.74, precision of 0.73, and recall of 0.83. Pairwise t-tests showed that nnUNetv2 outperformed other models in segmentation accuracy (p < 0.01). Clinically, nnUNetv2 also demonstrated superior specificity for lesion detection (0.90) compared to the other models. All models performed similarly in distinguishing diffuse and focal lesions, predicting weight-bearing lesions, and identifying lesion locations, although nnUNetv2 had higher specificity. Sensitivity was highest for rib lesions and lowest for spine lesions across all models. Conclusions: EfficientNet and nnUNetv2 were the top-performing models for detection and segmentation, respectively. Radiomic features derived from deep learning-based segmentations were comparable to manual segmentations, supporting clinical applicability. Further analysis of lesion detection and spatial distribution underscores the models' potential for improving diagnostic workflows and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Bone metastasisComputed tomographyDeep learningProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID41822381
PMCPMC12976853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.