ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2026
Goal-directed actions and habits in head-fixed mice.
Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impaired midfrontal‑motor theta phase synchronization characterizes maladaptive motivational behavior in people with obsessive‑compulsive disorder.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Drug self-administration in head-fixed mice.Nature protocols · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Behavioral control is fundamentally governed by a dynamic balance between flexible, goal-directed actions and efficient but highly automated habits. While the transition to habitual control can be adaptive, an imbalance favoring rigid habits over flexible control is thought to contribute significantly to the core pathology of many neuropsychiatric disorders. Despite their pervasiveness, the precise neural circuits that govern this critical balance remain poorly characterized. A major barrier to progress lies in the technical challenge of tracking single neurons in relevant circuits as goal-directed behavior becomes habitual. Methods: Here, we introduce and validate a novel head-fixed instrumental learning paradigm in mice that enables the differentiation of goal-directed and habitual behavioral control. This model provides an unprecedented platform for high-resolution, longitudinal Results: Our findings demonstrate that mice rapidly acquire lever pressing, exhibiting robust active/inactive lever discrimination, and comparable initial learning between limited and overtrained cohorts. Crucially, while mice with limited training readily reduced their lever-press behavior when the resulting outcome was devalued or omitted, overtrained mice displayed characteristic insensitivity to outcome devaluation and omission. Furthermore, chemogenetic inhibition of the DLS in overtrained mice restored sensitivity to both devaluation and contingency reversal, blocking habit expression and preserving goal-directed control. Conclusion: These results establish a paradigm for studying both goal-directed actions and habits in head-fixed mice and validate the DLS as a key neuronal substrate as previously demonstrated in freely moving models. This paradigm represents a vital methodological advancement that overcomes the technical barriers to longitudinal, cellular-level interrogation. By providing the optical stability necessary to track the same neuronal ensembles across acquisition and expression of habits, this platform enables investigations into the computational neural dynamics underlying goal-directed and habitual behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.