SynthesisFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025
Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in gastrointestinal malignancies: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biological and Targeted Therapies in the Multidisciplinary Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that is effective in treating gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, the significant variability in its reported efficacy and safety profiles is likely due to differences in trial designs, patient populations, and clinical settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy and safety of T-DXd in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive GI malignancies. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA), utilizing the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Out of 5,594 articles reviewed, 10 studies were ultimately included after both primary and secondary screenings, providing data on the outcomes and safety of T-DXd in HER2-positive GI malignancies. The National Institute of Health quality assessment tool was employed to evaluate the quality of the studies. Pooled analyses were performed using the 'meta' package (Schwarzer et al., R programming language), and proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: We identified 653 patients treated with T-DXd for HER2-positive GI malignancies in 10 studies. The median age of the patients was 64.5 years (27-85) and 53% were male. The median follow-up duration was 5.9 months (0.5-30.5). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.15 (1.4-20.8) and 5.6 months (2.6-8.7), respectively. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) was 36.9% (95% CI:31.5%-42.5%, I² = 41%, n = 589), with partial response and complete response rates of 35.2% (95% CI:31.1%-39.5%, I² = 0%, n = 516) and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.0%-4.7%, I² = 73%, n = 516), respectively. The median duration of response (DoR) was 7 months (0.7-22.3). Reported adverse events included anemia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea, interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, heart failure, and hepatitis. For the 5.4 mg/kg dose, grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 67 patients. For the 6.4 mg/kg dose, 146 grade 3/4 adverse events were reported. Conclusions: This meta-analysis supports the efficacy of T-DXd in patients with HER2-positive GI malignancies with a moderate ORR, even in patients who have experienced disease progression after multiple lines of therapy. Overall, T-DXd is well-tolerated, with limited severe adverse events. These findings validate existing research and underscore the need for further clinical trials, particularly in earlier lines of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.