Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822282›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025

Case Report: Rapid resolution of fever after initiation of third-line rescue treatment with upadacitinib for acute severe ulcerative colitis in two young men.

Dan Pinzaru, Martin Kreysing, Tony Lesmeister, Miriam Schwandner, Patrick Michl, Annika Gauss

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan PinzaruDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin KreysingDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tony LesmeisterDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Miriam SchwandnerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick MichlDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Annika GaussDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening condition in patients with ulcerative colitis with overwhelming systemic inflammation. In case of steroid-refractory courses, the mainstay of therapy is currently infliximab or a calcineurin inhibitor, weighed against colectomy. Recently, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been shown to result in rapid and persistent responses even in steroid-refractory patients, so that their position in the therapeutic algorithm of ASUC has to be determined. We present-to our best knowledge, for the first time-two cases in which upadacitinib was administered as a third-line rescue therapy in steroid- and infliximab-refractory patients with persistent fever. Case presentations: A 33- and a 28-year-old man, both newly diagnosed with ulcerative pancolitis, presented with steroid-refractory courses of ASUC. Both suffered from fever with temperatures of >39°C in spite of empirical antibiotic therapy, and infection was carefully excluded. In both, infliximab at 5 mg/kg body weight failed to resolve the fever, and second salvage therapy with upadacitinib 45 mg led to swift resolution of the fever and to overall clinical response. Both patients were under ongoing upadacitinib treatment, and in outpatient surveillance, one of them in steroid-free clinical remission up to his last follow-up one year post treatment initiation, the other one up to his last follow-up four months post treatment initiation. Conclusion: Upadacitinib seems to be a valuable option even as a second salvage therapy in ASUC. Randomized controlled trials are warranted. However, it has to be kept in mind that ASUC, especially with septic symptoms such as fever, remains a life-threatening condition in which surgery always has to be evaluated, and that multiple overlapping immunosuppressive therapies may cause severe complications, such as infections.

Indexed as

acute severe ulcerative colitiscase reportfeverrescue treatmentupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID41822282
PMCPMC12952382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.