Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822245›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology open

Cognitive bias modification training (IVY) countering fatigue in people with breast cancer: A waitlist-control feasibility study.

Jody Geerts, Marcel Pieterse, Ester Siemerink, Peter Ten Klooster, Lucie Loman, Marleen Wensink, Falko Sniehotta, Christina Bode

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jody GeertsCentre for eHealth & Well-being Research, Section Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8826-032X
Marcel PieterseCentre for eHealth & Well-being Research, Section Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6900-3088
Ester SiemerinkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, ZGT Hospital Almelo/Hengelo, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6946-7651
Peter Ten KloosterCentre for eHealth & Well-being Research, Section Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2565-5439
Lucie LomanDutch Breast Cancer Association [Borstkanker Vereniging Nederland], Utrecht, Netherlands.
Marleen WensinkResearch & Advisory on Technology in Long-term Care, Academy Het Dorp, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5306-097X
Falko SniehottaDepartment of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Preventive Medicine, and Digital Health (CPD), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Christina BodeCentre for eHealth & Well-being Research, Section Psychology, Health and Technology, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The feasibility of a fatigue Cognitive Bias Modification training was evaluated in women on treatment for breast cancer in a multi-center waitlist-control design assessing feasibility criteria, such as recruitment, retention, and completion rates, as well as effects on fatigue bias. Methods: Five hospitals were each asked to recruit 30 patients, who were sequentially divided in active and delayed treatment groups. Fatigue bias and self-reported outcomes (fatigue, vitality, avoidance, and all-or-nothing behavior) were measured in baseline, training, and follow-up phases. Results: Feasibility results were mixed with recruitment and retention not meeting predetermined criteria, but completion and variability were judged positively. Training effects on fatigue bias compared to control were found. Conclusions: This study evaluated a promising novel fatigue intervention. Continuation with an RCT is encouraged with recruitment and retention strategies reconsidered. Trial registry: This study's protocol (Geerts, et al., 2024) was preregistered at the Open Science Framework on October 31st, 2023.

Indexed as

breast cancercognitive bias modificationeHealthfatiguefeasibilityself-identity bias

Identifiers

PMID41822245
PMCPMC12976413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.