Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Lucy C Snow, Andrew D Wales, Susan M Withenshaw, Joanna R Lawes, Adrienne Mackintosh, Francesca Martelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lucy C SnowDepartment of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Andrew D WalesDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guilford, United Kingdom.
Susan M WithenshawDepartment of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Joanna R LawesDepartment of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Adrienne MackintoshDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Francesca MartelliDepartment of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Raw meat pet food is increasingly popular in Great Britain prompting concerns about its potential to transmit zoonotic pathogens, particularly Aim: To investigate correlations between Methods: Data collected by the Animal and Plant Health Agency from 2013 to 2022 (phenotypically-determined Results: Over time both the number and serovar diversity of Conclusion: Despite limitations for establishing direct transmission pathways, the findings highlight raw meat pet food as a potential vector for

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancedogsfoodborne pathogenraw meat pet foodSalmonellazoonoses

Identifiers

PMID41822231
PMCPMC12975570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.