SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Vertebral artery contribution to cerebral cortex perfusion in cattle after slaughter by ventral neck incision: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Electrophysiologic evidence of loss of consciousness in cattle during slaughter with and without stunning: a systematic review and methodological overview.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Pooled it
- Indicators of loss of consciousness in slaughter without stunning: a neuroanatomical reappraisal.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Jewish shechita and Islamic halal are distinct yet similar forms of slaughter by exsanguination via ventral neck incision (SEVNI); neither permits preslaughter stunning. SEVNI has been criticized on the grounds that the vertebral arteries in cattle, which remain intact after SEVNI, may continue to supply blood to the brain, potentially delaying loss of consciousness (LOC) and causing unnecessary pain and distress to the animal. In this context, LOC is the loss of cortical awareness, which by definition abolishes sensibility and pain perception. The objective of this review is to evaluate the literature that specifically addresses the role of the vertebral artery in brain perfusion following SEVNI. Methods: This study was not funded. A non-registered systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science (last searched 02/10/2026) identified experimental, observational and physiological studies that assessed vertebral artery hemodynamics and/or evaluated the functional significance of the vertebral artery in cattle. Non-cattle studies, studies lacking relevant measures, reviews, commentaries, and abstracts without full text were excluded. Quantitative pooling (meta-analysis) was not performed due to methodological and outcome variability therefore results were synthesized narratively. Results: Thirteen studies were included, with all articles independently reviewed by co-authors to minimize risk of bias. Using the ROBINS-I framework, the overall risk of bias across included studies was assessed as moderate. Across the reviewed studies, evidence consistently demonstrated that immediately following SEVNI, vertebral blood flow and pressure decrease to negligible levels, with most residual flow diverted away from the cerebral cortex. Limitations: Study limitations include heterogeneous study designs, variable outcomes and methods. Conclusion: The available evidence indicates that vertebral artery flow following SEVNI is unlikely to be sufficient to sustain cortical perfusion, support integrated cortical function or delay LOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.