ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Systemic neuropsychology: toward a contemporary theory of topological functional systems.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes a formalization of psychological functions as Topological Functional Systems, drawing on the historical-cultural tradition and functional systems theory, and integrating them with tools from contemporary topological dynamics. First, it reviews the theoretical foundations that conceive psychological activity as a systemic, dynamic organization oriented toward adaptive outcomes. It then develops a mathematical formalization that accounts for functional invariance under variable modes of execution and network reorganization. On this basis, the article derives clinical implications for neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation, emphasizing functional reorganization rather than localized deficit. Finally, it discusses the scope and limitations of the model in dialogue with current approaches in neuroscience and neuropsychology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.