ArticleBJUI compass2026
Developing sustainable Emergency Urology Simulation Training in sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Simulation-based education (SBE) is widely adopted in high-income countries to enhance surgical training, but opportunities remain limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Emergency Urology Simulation Training (EUST) was developed to address knowledge and skill gaps in managing urological emergencies in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods: EUST courses were delivered in Ethiopia, Uganda and Malawi using a single-day format combining pre-course online learning, didactic teaching with hands-on simulation. Locally, sourced animal tissue models were employed to replicate ureteric, bladder, renal, scrotal and penile injury repairs. Pre- and post-course assessments included multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and confidence surveys. Post-course composite scores were compared across sites using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Faculty feedback evaluated preparedness and sustainability. Results: A total of 46 participants completed EUST across four sites, baseline knowledge was low (mean pre-course MCQ scores: 8.0-10.75/15). Post-course scores improved (10.63-12.72/15), with knowledge gains of 15%-32%. Confidence in managing rare emergencies, such as penile fracture and ureteric reimplantation, increased universally; 100% of delegates recommended integrating EUST into national training curricula. Faculty anxiety about SBE delivery decreased post-training, and senior trainees transitioned well into faculty roles, supporting ongoing sustainability. Cost-effectiveness was achieved by using animal tissue and donated instruments, reducing reliance on expensive synthetic models. Conclusion: EUST is an affordable, scalable and effective model for surgical education in LMICs. The 'See one, run one' approach enables replication across both specialty and international boundaries and fosters sustainable local faculty development. EUST demonstrates a significant positive educational impact and offers a sustainable programme for improving emergency urology care in resource-limited settings. Partnering with COSECSA facilitates a reduction in UK faculty requirement long-term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.