Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822199›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2026

Identifying strategies to leverage electronic health records and health information technology in colorectal cancer screening in primary care clinics.

Joshua E Richardson, Sonja Hoover, Madeleine Jones, Sarah Kobrin, Sujha Subramanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua E RichardsonRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-2673
Sonja HooverImplenomics, Dover, DE, United States.
Madeleine JonesRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.
Sarah KobrinNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, United States.
Sujha SubramanianImplenomics, Dover, DE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We report on using electronic health records (EHRs) and other health information technology (IT) (eg, REDCap, Excel, and population-health tools) for tracking patients and managing interventions to improve colorectal screening (CRC) among primary care practices who participated in the National Cancer Institute's Accelerating Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-up through Implementation Science (ACCSIS) program. Methods: We conducted semi-structured, recorded interviews with staff from 7 ACCSIS Research Projects (RPs). Using the interview notes, we conducted content analysis to report on the characteristics of the EHR systems and health IT, and thematic analysis to identify key concepts related to the ability to capture and monitor data for CRC screening. Results: RPs used different data capture models to support EHRs and health IT: (1) Discussion: RPs would benefit from more streamlined data capture and reporting for managing CRC screening in primary care. Efforts reportedly fell onto staff who could have benefited from training around data handling and EHR-specific navigation. Conclusions: RPs experienced challenges in leveraging data capture models for EHR and health IT data management. Our research calls for technical capabilities that promote more efficient data capture and reporting, as well as greater capacity building among clinic staff.

Indexed as

colorectal neoplasmsearly detection of cancerelectronic health records

Identifiers

PMID41822199
PMCPMC12978244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.