Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822180›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology research2026

Clinical Efficacy of Early and Late Vedolizumab or Infliximab Interventions in Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Rui Ping Meng, Jian Zhang, Hao Qi Wei, Xi Ping Liao, En Liu, Hui Lin, Bao Bao Huang, Lin Lyu, Yan Ling Wei, Jian Yun Zhou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rui Ping MengDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Jian ZhangCenter of Teaching and Training, DaPing Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Hao Qi WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Xi Ping LiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
En LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Hui LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Bao Bao HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Lin LyuDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400060, China.
Yan Ling WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, DaPing Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
Jian Yun ZhouClinical Medical Research Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.
Xia XieDepartment of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Late biologic intervention has been partly displaced during the last decade by early biologic therapy. However, there is a scarcity of direct evidence to inform clinical decision-making with greater confidence. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the early biologic approach with those of the late biologic approach in patients with moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Moderate UC patients treated with biologics between January 2021 and February 2024 from three Chinese centers were retrospectively included. The outcomes included steroid-free clinical remission rates, clinical remission rates, and mucosal healing rates at week 14 and week 52. Results: A total of 124 moderate UC cases were included. No marked differences in the steroid-free clinical remission rates and clinical remission rates were observed between the two groups at week 14 or at week 52 (P > 0.050). The early biologic therapy group exhibited a numerically higher mucosal healing rate at week 14 (23.3% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.115) and week 52 (15/27 (55.6%) vs. 13/37 (35.1%), P = 0.104) compared to the late biologic therapy group, yet there was no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: No significant differences in steroid-free clinical remission, clinical remission, and mucosal healing were observed between early and late biologic intervention group.

Indexed as

Early biologic interventionEfficacyLate biologic interventionModerate ulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID41822180
PMCPMC12978406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.