ArticleArXiv2026
Shape-Independent Fluidization in Epithelial Cell Monolayers.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue fluidity regulates many critical biological processes, including embryonic development, wound healing, and cancer metastasis. In confluent epithelia, where cell packing fraction is effectively fixed, the prevailing paradigm postulates that transitions between solid-like jammed and fluid-like unjammed states are governed by a geometric cell shape index determined by the balance of cortical tension and intercellular adhesion. Here, we challenge this geometric framework by reporting a mode of fluidization in epithelial monolayers that is entirely shape-independent. We observe that reducing cell-cell adhesion triggers a substantial increase in fluidity, yet this occurs without any corresponding change in cell shape, cell density, substrate traction, or junctional line tension. This decoupling of shape and fluidity reveals that current vertex models, which treat adhesion solely as a contribution to interfacial tension, are incomplete. To reconcile these findings, we extend the theoretical framework to account for the dual nature of adhesion -- its thermodynamic role in setting interfacial adhesion energy at the cell-cell junctions and its kinetic role in generating viscous drag as cells slide past their neighbors. This generalized model quantitatively captures the experimental data, demonstrating that the interplay between adhesive energetics and dissipative friction is essential for a complete understanding of epithelial fluidity.
Identifiers
41822156PMC12976911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.