Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41822153›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

The Dynamics of Inducible Genetic Circuits.

Zitao Yang, Rebecca J Rousseau, Sara D Mahdavi, Hernan G Garcia, Rob Phillips

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zitao YangDepartment of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Rebecca J RousseauDepartment of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Sara D MahdaviDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
Hernan G GarciaBiophysics Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 904720.
Rob PhillipsDepartment of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.

Funding

The Principles of Regulatory, Conformational and Evolutionary AdaptationR35GM118043 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ROB PHILLIPS · 2016 to 2026
$7.9M
NIH Director's Pioneer Award (RMI)DP1OD000217 · OD · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI PHILLIPS, ROB · 2004 to 2008
$4.0M
Predictive understanding of the temporal control of transcription in Drosophila developmentR01GM139913 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GARCIA, HERNAN GUSTAVO · 2021 to 2024
$1.2M
In vivo mechanisms of Dorsal-mediated transcriptional control in developmentR01GM152815 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI GARCIA, HERNAN GUSTAVO · 2024 to 2024
$306k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139913NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152815NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118043NIH HHS DP1 OD000217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes are connected in complex networks of interactions where often the product of one gene is a transcription factor that alters the expression of another. Many of these networks are based on a few fundamental motifs leading to switches and oscillators of various kinds. And yet, there is more to the story than which transcription factors control these various circuits. These transcription factors are often themselves under the control of effector molecules that bind them and alter their level of activity. Traditionally, much beautiful work has shown how to think about the stability of the different states achieved by these fundamental regulatory architectures by examining how parameters such as transcription rates, degradation rates and dissociation constants tune the circuit, giving rise to behavior such as bistability. However, such studies explore dynamics without asking how these quantities are altered in real time in living cells as opposed to at the fingertips of the synthetic biologist's pipette or on the computational biologist's computer screen. In this paper, we make a departure from the conventional dynamical systems view of these regulatory motifs by using statistical mechanical models to focus on endogenous signaling knobs such as effector concentrations rather than on the convenient but more experimentally remote knobs such as dissociation constants, transcription rates and degradation rates that are often considered. We also contrast the traditional use of Hill functions to describe transcription factor binding with more detailed thermodynamic models. This approach provides insights into how biological parameters are tuned to control the stability of regulatory motifs in living cells, sometimes revealing quite a different picture than is found by using Hill functions and tuning circuit parameters by hand.

Identifiers

PMID41822153
PMCPMC12976931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.